Series Details

Click 'view items' to see a list of items in this Series
Series ID554
Previous System LocationSRS554
TitleMaterial Relating to the Crown's Defence - Mabo and Ors v the State of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia (No. 2)
Parent Series
This series does not have a parent series.
Start Date Circa 20/5/1982
End Date Circa 3/6/1992
Date Statement 20 May 1982 to 3 Jun 1992 are the official start and end dates of the Mabo No 2 Court case; however, some background/historical records are dated in the 1700s or earlier.
Date Notes N/A

Evidence, papers, transcripts, submissions, statements etc re Mabo v Qld and the Commonwealth of Australia, used, annotated and accumulated by the Solicitor General's Office and the Crown Solicitor's Office for purposes relating to the Crown's defence.

Go to Description...

Items Total Items: 0
Departmental NumbersN/A
System of Arrangement By topic/document title. Most of these items are copies of original documents, used and annotated by the Defence for research. Papers are not in chronological order and are not always neatly arranged according to the Counsel that worked on them.
How To Use Series Search item list by topic.

Creating Agencies

Agency IDTitleFromTo
7339Solicitor General's Office II 20/5/1982 23/10/1989
8782Crown Solicitor's Office III 23/10/1989 1/5/1991
8783Crown Law (Department of Justice and Attorney-General) 1/5/1991 3/6/1992
  Back to Top

Access and Restrictions

Access Category100 Years
Access ProcedurePermission to access restricted material by responsible agency
Agency Now Responsible
Agency ID: 8620
Department of Justice and Attorney-General (II)
Restriction DetailsN/A
Regulation Details
Back to Top

Subordinate Series

Details of subordinate series do not exist or are unavailable.
  Back to Top

Controlling Series

Details of controlling series do not exist or are unavailable.
  Back to Top

Controlled Series

Details of controlled series do not exist or are unavailable.
  Back to Top

Previous Series

Details of previous series do not exist or are unavailable.
  Back to Top

Subsequent Series

Details of subsequent series do not exist or are unavailable.
  Back to Top

Related Series

Finding Aids

This series has no finding aids.
  Back to Top

Publication Notes

This series has no publication notes.
  Back to Top

Physical / Technical Use

Copies Elsewhere

Copyright Status

Copyright State of Queensland
Back to Top


Note: Please also note that some items are Court records of cases other than Mabo v Qld (No.2). i.e. cases heard in Sydney and Canberra Courts.
Back to Top

Information Sources

Guide to the Papers of Edward Koiki Mabo in the National Library of Australia, National Library of Australia, Canberra, 1955
Mabo: A Judicial Revolution - The Aboriginal Land Rights Decision and Its Impact on Australian Law, edited by MA Stephenson and Suri Ratnapala (in particular, introduction and 'Some Problems of Proof: the Admissibility of Traditional Evidence' by BA Keon-Cohen), St Lucia, University of Queensland Press, 1993.
Back to Top


These papers document some of the native land title claim launched in 1982 in the High Court by Eddie Mabo, Celuia Mapo Salee, Sam Passi, David Passi, and James Rice (the Plaintiffs) against the State of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia (the Defendants), commonly named "Mabo and Ors v Queensland (No. 2)".

The Claim: The plaintiffs claimed that they had lived in permanently settled communities on the islands maintaining a valid, traditional connection with the land. They acknowledged that sovereignty was asserted by the British Crown upon annexation, but they argued that their native rights to traditional lands had not been extinguished by the Crown's granting of land to others. On behalf of the Meriam people, through the Statement of Claim issued on 20 May 1982, the plaintiffs maintained that compensation was owed to them in relation to dealings with the claimed land.

In June 1985, the plaintiffs filed a demurrer contesting the validity of the "Queensland Coast Islands Act 1985" which Queensland relied on as part of its defence (Writ 1585/1985), commonly named "Mabo and Another v The State of Queensland and Another (No.1)". Consequently, the proceedings of the Supreme Court (No.2), were temporarily suspended and in December 1988, the High Court delivered its judgment regarding the demurrer proceedings, deciding in the plaintiffs' favour and declaring the Act contrary to the Federal Racial Discrimination Act 1975.

On 3 June 1992 a legal and historical precedent was set when the High Court delivered its ruling in the plaintiffs' favour. The decision recognised that Aboriginal native title had existed prior to European settlement and consequently rejected the legal doctrine of terra nullius (a land 'practically unoccupied'; at the point of Britain's proclaimed sovereignty).

Queensland as the defendant, had produced a wide array of case material i.e. historical, anthropological, administrative and departmental sources, which were incorporated into the pleadings. Evidence submitted by the Crown consisted of 'original evidence' (oral and documentary), 'opinion evidence' and 'admissibility of hearsay evidence'. Islander and non-Islander witnesses were called by both parties. Islanders gave oral evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs, although other witnesses such as the Anthropologist, Dr Jeremy Beckett also provided evidence. The Crown engaged, on behalf of the Defence, an historian, an anthropologist, a retired senior officer of a Queensland department and an ethnohistorian. Among those seconded by the Crown, Ruth Kerr and Patrick Killoran's papers became evidence/court exhibits which are included in this series.

Documentary evidence was submitted for the case in the form of exhibits and includes: Historical works re initial contact on the Islands and activities thereafter; Professor A.C. Haddon's anthropological expedition to Murray Island in the 1890s; various papers/official Government documents and annotated photocopied articles recording past dealings with land portions on the Islands (eg. order in councils, law reports, court cases, proclamations, correspondence, acts and regulations); analysis of Murray Island Court decisions); plaintiffs' documents, and annexures (genealogy tables, maps, drawings, diagrams, plans, photographs of the Murray Islands and the portions claimed).

This series contains: Personal statements; Statement of facts (plaintiffs' and defendant's, and the Crown's preferred Statement of Facts); P J Killoran's papers; affidavits; examinations of exhibits and plaintiffs' statement of facts; reports; responses to the plaintiffs' statement of facts; court transcripts; submissions (also specific claims, tables, chains of title, and life/personal histories); plaintiffs' response to the defendant's submission; categories of evidence; court orders; statement of claim; bylaws of Island Councils, etc.

-There are duplicate or triplicate copies of some items within this series. Many papers are annotated by various Crown Counsels (however,the particular author of the annotations is not always stated/clear).
- IMPORTANT: Some files such as genealogies, personal histories, Murray Island Court records, etc. may contain ADOPTION or sexual offences information.
Back to Top

Preferred Citation

Queensland State Archives Series ID 554, Material Relating to the Crown's Defence - Mabo and Ors v the State of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia (No. 2)
Back to Top
Last updated 9 September 2016
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY 3.0) ( )
Share :

Is your feedback about:

Page feedback

How satisfied are you with your experience today?*


Feedback on government services, departments and staff

Please use our complaints and compliments form